Being a person of uniqueness in the modern age has its pros and cons. Given that our current society seems to be morbidly obsessed with mental health, in possibly not the most rational of ways, it is hard to say whether society is more accepting or more aggressive and intolerant. Don’t see the correlation? A quick review of today’s headlines clearly illustrates our societal obsession with mental health:
“How Corruption is Strangling US Innovation” James Allworth (Harvard Business Review)
“You won’t believe these phobias” (MSN.com)
OK, so we talk about mental health a lot these days. At least we don’t lock people up into big asylums anymore, but are we more tolerant? If we are looking at past and present perspectives, the question becomes this: have we ever been more tolerant of these personality or mental deviations, or is that just wishful thinking?
There are references to mental illness as far back as Socrates, who considered it mystical and even inspirational (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mental_disorders). Diagnosis and treatments were recorded throughout history in Egypt, China, and India. In the 700 and 800s we saw the first asylums, and in the 1200s people actually started experimenting (sometimes horribly so) with people who were, to varying degrees, considered insane.
According to Wikipedia,” Insanity, craziness or madness is a spectrum of behaviors characterized by certain abnormal mental or behavioral patterns,” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity). It can also be a deviation from social norms. I’d say that accounts for about 90% of the people I know.
Thankfully, the psychiatric community, our keepers of all that is considered mental health, also actively debates the “what is normal” question. In is 2009 article “What is Normal,” Peter Kramer cites that we have “narrowed healthy behavior so dramatically that our quirks and eccentricities—the normal emotional range of adolescence and adulthood—have become problems we fear and expect drugs to fix,” (http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200910/what-is-normal). He also goes on to say how important the fields of psychology and psychiatry are to modern society. However, if you have ever had the urge to read the DSM-4 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), you will find some pretty interesting things such as Facebook dependence, Math compulsion, Knitting dependence, hyper activity, etc. It seems that almost anything a human being can conceive to do can become a mental disorder of some sort.
A couple of years ago I attended a seminar at Thompson Rivers University about mental health and anxiety disorders. I can’t for the life of me remember the speakers name (a memory disorder?), but he did say this, “we all have anxiety and that is normal.” He also said that, “it is the degree of the anxiety and how much time we spend on our own personal rituals to manage the anxiety the drives the need for psychiatric intervention.” Essentially, what he is saying is that if you have anxiety and you spend an hour a day managing it, you are OK, BUT if you have anxiety and you spent eight hours a day managing it, then it is a problem. This is one of the first truly rational statements that I have heard when talking about mental health issues.
So, I guess my position on mental health would be that I am quirky, and I know it. I am a little eccentric and sometime neurotic. It’s a continuum. Some days I spend a lot of time managing myself. Some days I don’t need to. Do I want to conform to some abstract standard defined by a society that appears to be irrationally obsessed with every possible form of deviation under the sun? Absolutely not, and neither should YOU!

